PhilArchive
open access
Governing Distributed Systems with Intelligent Agents
Large distributed systems are now operated through layers of schedulers, container controllers, service meshes, monitoring pipelines, and human runbooks. These mechanisms improve scale, but they also create governance problems: local controllers can fight one another, remediation rules may violate service-level or compliance constraints, and operators often lack a compact record of why a system changed. This paper presents Policy-Bounded Agent Governance (PBAG), a 2021-era architecture for coordinating intelligent software agents that monitor, diagnose, and repair distributed systems while remaining subject to explicit operational authority. PBAG combines local agents near services and clusters with a governance plane that checks action rights, conflict constraints, freshness requirements, and audit completeness before any adaptation is committed. The method builds on autonomic computing, agent-based software engineering, self-adaptive architecture, cluster management, cloud elasticity, and machine-learning systems practice. A controlled prototype study evaluates PBAG across four operational scenarios: load surge, replica degradation, stale forecasting input, and accelerator-backed training contention. Compared with manual runbooks and independent local agents, PBAG reduces median recovery time by 37%, lowers conflicting actions from 18 to 4 per 120 incidents, and keeps p95 request latency within 7% of a static-policy baseline. The central result is that intelligent agents are most useful for distributed-system governance when their autonomy is bounded by shared policy, explicit conflict resolution, and durable decision records.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Future of Agentic AI and Cloud Governance#248498
- Architecture of the “No”: Structural Intelligence (SI) as the Organization of Form Under Pressure#165218
- From static oversight to distributed corrigibility#696675
- Structural Dynamics: A Conceptual Model of Correction, Drift, and Burden in Organizations and AI-Mediated Systems#694296
- Unified Benchmark for Agentic Governance Across Power, Finance, and Software#204122
Record · ID 688968
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive