Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Quantum Mechanics from Records: Three Consistency Postulates and One Kernel Recover the Dirac–von Neumann Formalism, with the Projection Postulate as a Theorem

Benander, Ajax
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
We give an axiom set for quantum mechanics in which measurement is derived rather than posited. The primitives are consistency constraints on observer-indexed information states: three postulates — determinacy indexed to an information state, informational blanks identified with superpositions, and a two-generation consistency-pruning rule whose ∃∀ form is selected by elimination within a stated class — together with one quantitative axiom, a path-pair weighting kernel over the powerset of alternatives. The main result is a recovery theorem. Under the assignment of a cluster of alternatives to the vector $\sum_p e^{iS[p]/\hbar}\,|x(p)\rangle$ over the readout configurations, the axiom set recovers the Dirac–von Neumann formalism axiom by axiom: states are rays, superposition is the union of clusters in the interacting regime, observables are the partitions that records induce, the Born rule is the weight of a record-restricted cluster, the projection postulate is pruning followed by renormalization, composites are products of path spaces, evolution is the kernel’s composition law, and no-signalling is an algebraic identity. Six of the seven axioms are theorems of the set; the seventh, the Born rule, is absorbed into the one weight law, the amplitudes being recovered from cluster weights by polarization up to a global phase and complex conjugation. No measurement, projection, or observables axiom remains. The theorem is exhibited three times: a classification theorem sorting every candidate superposition under an arbitrary detector configuration into three bins fixed by the records, which relocates the quantum–classical boundary from scale to information; a two-tag interferometry configuration displaying both composition regimes in one experiment and closing on the complementarity relations for reasons that are theorems; and a reductio showing the resulting realism surviving Bell’s theorem, which prices hidden valuations and finds none here to price. The paper is a re-axiomatization, not an operational reconstruction: the kernel is posited, and its content — continuity, local tomography, the quadratic form — is what the reconstruction programs seek from operational axioms. Every assumption is inventoried and the open constructions are named.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 689378
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive