PhilArchive
open access
From Intent to Decision: Observing the Translation of Purpose in Institutional Decision Systems (Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Patagonia)
How do institutions act on abstract purposes such as “improving health” or “saving the planet”? This paper argues that they do not act on such purposes directly, but only on the representations into which those purposes are translated. As institutional intent moves across governance layers, it is reformulated into criteria, categories, and signals that make alternatives comparable and decisions executable. The analysis develops a representational account of institutional decision-making. Institutions are conceptualized as systems that depend on commensuration: heterogeneous aims must be rendered into comparable forms in order to support evaluation and allocation. This transformation is structurally necessary, but it also alters the meaning of the concepts being operationalized. Decisions are therefore made on representations of purpose rather than on purpose itself. Using a minimal and replicable traceability method, the paper reconstructs how institutional purpose is translated across publicly available governance artefacts in three cases: Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Patagonia. The analysis shows that as representations stabilize within decision systems, they become the effective objects of decision-making. This gives rise to a systematic divergence between originating intent and enacted criteria, referred to as translation drift. The paper contributes to social ontology and the philosophy of social science by identifying a structural condition of institutional action: what can be represented in decision-relevant form determines what can be selected. Institutional coherence is therefore not a property of outcomes or stated intentions, but of the relation between originating concepts and the representations through which decisions are made. By demonstrating that these transformations are empirically observable in governance artefacts, the paper connects philosophical accounts of representation and commensuration with the operational structure of real-world decision systems.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Governance Is Not Enough to Prove Responsibility: A Conceptual and Testable Architecture for Demonstrable Responsibility in AI Systems#691051
- A agenda setting e a comunicação nas organizações: um encontro possível#946861
- The nature of agency: Designing agentic systems using a biomimetic lens#389809
- The Structural-Constructivist Resolution of the Human Operating System: A Functional Ontology for Affective Science#204238
- The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis#24246
Record · ID 689651
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive