PhilArchive
open access
Logic, Efficiency, and Values: A Triadic Analytical Framework for Social Evolution
What is the ultimate driving force underlying social evolution? This paper proposes an integrative analytical framework, arguing that in the hard-power competition of the human material world, the ultimate and inescapable underlying traction is "efficiency," while "logical optimization/degradation" is the fundamental mechanism driving efficiency changes. Values reside at the upper level, acting as directional regulators that set the weights of efficiency relative to other non-efficiency objectives in the objective function. The relationship among the three can be understood through an engineering analogy: efficiency is engine performance (power layer), logic is engine structure (mechanism layer), and values are the steering wheel (directional regulator). This paper introduces "logical degradation" as a symmetrical concept, proposes "direct cost bearing capacity" as a hard boundary for efficiency traction, and reveals the inescapability of competition: not participating in competition cannot prevent others from competing for resources; complete isolation can cut off efficiency transmission, but at the cost of an exponential widening of technological gaps. This paper strictly delimits the scope of application of the theory, provides illustrative evidence through cross-level cases from technological history, corporate competition, and national policies, and offers five testable qualitative corollaries. The paper also discusses the positive correlation between efficiency and hard power at the micro-individual level, "managed openness" as an intermediate zone between efficiency laws and institutional intervention, and the conditions, buffering mechanisms, and the three-outlet framework for the long-term traction of efficiency on values. This paper aims to provide a testable and dialogable integrative paradigm for social evolution.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- THE STRATEGIC MOOTNESS GAP#486148
- Analysis and dialectic: studies in the logic of foundation problems#109232
- Lessons, narratives, and research directions for a sustainable circular economy.#30723
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Formation of Platform Law and its Evolution towards the Concept of Ecosystem Law#1176698
- Marginal vs. Average Effective Load Carrying Capability: How Should Capacity Markets Deal with Alternative Generation Forms?#1148947
Record · ID 690171
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive