PhilArchive
open access
Paradox: Simply Invalid Argument
This paper demonstrates that paradoxes are simply invalid arguments. A paradox arises from an invalid theory, the inappropriate application of a theory, or a misunderstanding by the person arguing. The cause of these is a lack of understanding of the preconditions. As examples of paradoxes, this paper cites Achilles and the Tortoise, the Monty Hall problem, the paradox of tolerance, the paradox of diversity, and natural rights. There is an aspect where paradoxes point out flaws in arguments and deepen the discussion. However, it remains true that paradoxes are invalid arguments caused by a lack of understanding of the preconditions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Harms and Wrongs in Epistemic Practice#698130
- Epistemic logic and the foundations of game theory#697446
- True Knowledge#698749
- Modern Paradoxes of Aristotle’s Logic#725053
- 'What the Tortoise said to Achilles': Lewis Carroll's Paradox of Inference#754447
Record · ID 690385
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive