PhilArchive
open access
From Embedded Finance to Embedded Obligation: A Law-and-Economics Theory of Consumer Protection in Platform-Mediated Financial Services
Embedded finance is usually described as the integration of financial services into non-financial platforms. This article argues that the deeper regulatory transformation is the embedding of future legal and economic obligations into ordinary consumption, work, business, and entertainment environments. When credit, payment, wage-advance, wallet, and merchant-financing functions are delivered through plat form architecture, consumer protection cannot focus only on the formal product or licensed provider. It must also examine how obligations are framed, made salient or obscure, personalized through data, and allocated across platforms, merchants, lenders, and technical intermediaries. The article develops a law and-economics theory of Embedded Obligation Architecture, explains its irreducible object, refines its four layers, and distinguishes it from choice architecture, digital nudging, dark patterns, behavioral contract theory, and platform governance. It specifies the evidentiary limits of transferring behavioral evidence to embedded-finance contexts and proposes a Functional Embedded Obligation Test as a standard with gateway elements, evidentiary thresholds, legal vehicles, safe harbors, and proportionate remedies.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Honosis: An Akan Tripartite Anthropology as Architecture for Personal Identity in the Platform Era#237143
- Empiricism and Privacy Policies in the Restatement of Consumer Contract Law#400636
- Soulbound AI, Soulbound Robots: How Ethereum's ERC-5192 Creates Fingerprints for Autonomous AI Agents (AI Rights 7)#704623
- Model Welfare or User Welfare? On the Structural Absence of the Subject in AI Care Frameworks#100896
- Damages liability for privacy infringements: the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in light of The Privacy Fallacy#1177626
Record · ID 690887
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive