PhilArchive
open access
Defending minimal non-realism
Reply to commentators in Semiotic Studies special issue on Unreal Beliefs. I defend the position developed in this book, i.e., minimal non-realism, against various charges. First, I defend the way I reconstructed folk commitments to realism about beliefs. Second, I deal with the arbitrariness charge against my definition of belief realism. Third, I critically evaluate a counterproposal to my view, namely the idea that beliefs are socially constructed natural kinds. Then I deal with the challenges levelled against my arguments against realism about belief. Finally, I reconsider some of the consequences of minimal non-realism and consider potential alternatives to it.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Pursuitworthiness of Majority World Psychology#114512
- Pragmatic Realism: Towards a Reconciliation of Enactivism and Realism#704364
- Epistemic selectivity, historical threats, and the non-epistemic tenets of scientific realism#749908
- Pseudo-neutrality of EOE and the ideological presuppositions of naturalism and materialism#713629
- Ten queries about Hasok Chang’s pragmatic realism#696990
Record · ID 690984
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive