The Framework Layer: Seven Structural Diagnostics for Premise Alignment

A companion paper documented SANA OS's Framework Layer — seven analytical lenses (CPM, GMM, RBM, RSM, Legitimacy Layer, History Analysis, Value Formation) — as uniformly constrained to structural description, never rendering a verdict. This paper examines each framework's internal formalism in depth, and argues that several converge, independently and without apparent direct derivation, on traditions already established in adjacent academic fields. CPM's account of narrative sanctification under sustained success, termed the Success Paradox, converges with Danny Miller's Icarus Paradox in organizational research. RSM's six-role, dual-loop model of collective decision-making converges with Stafford Beer's Viable System Model in management cybernetics, with RSM's Auditor role performing the function of Beer's algedonic escalation channel. GMM and RBM are shown to share a single demand-supply formalism applied at different scopes. Legitimacy Layer and History Analysis are examined as a paired diagnostic for narrative-institution divergence, resting on the same fact-perception-record structure formalized in this project's foundational paper. Value Formation is shown to apply GMM's layered architecture at individual scale via the Proximity Rule. The paper closes by applying the full integrated stack to a documented 2026 Japanese Supreme Court decision, showing the seven frameworks jointly producing a structural account no single framework supplies alone, and states as a limit that several of the formalisms examined share the calibration problem a companion paper identified in SANA OS's Δv variable.