Standing, More or Less...

So long as blame has the right content, tone and force, why fuss over who does it? To date, we have been approaching this problem, of standing to blame, the wrong way. We have assumed that factors relevant to a person's standing to blame, such as hypocrisy, and whether blaming is any of their business, either give a person full standing, or none whatsoever. This is a red herring. Rather than all-or-nothing, standing to blame comes in degrees. I develop this alternative approach, showing that it offers a more plausible way to understand the problem, and brings to light some central normative implications of standing. When we need to be selective about who blames, and how to blame, standing helps us choose the right options.