PhilArchive
open access
Could Not Have Noticed Four Modes of Cognitive Inaccessibility and the Ambiguity of Perceptual Blame
After a missed finding on a chest radiograph, a reviewer says: she should have seen it. The judgement presupposes that she could have. I argue that “could have seen it” is systematically four-way ambiguous, and that posterior-level predictive-processing explanations do not by themselves distinguish the relevant possibilities because a posterior is defined over a content space whose construction, acquisition, and finite-time exploration are not themselves posterior quantities. I distinguish four modes in which a content z may fail to become cognitively effective: architectural exclusion, where no setting of the system’s learnable parameters yields z; acquisitional exclusion, where some setting would yield z but the current one does not; dynamical inaccessibility, where z is instantiable under current parameters but fails to become accessible with effective probability within the operative horizon; and inferential suppression, where z is accessible in time but predictively disfavoured. The modes are nested but individuated by what is held fixed across distinct timescales, and their truthmakers are respectively combinatorial, acquisitional, transport-theoretic, and inferential. The typology adapts the approximation–optimization–estimation decomposition from statistical learning theory, adding a synchronic/diachronic split within the estimation term and a structural diagnostic of finite-time transport based on the spectral properties of a metastable-state generator. I then show how the four readings of “you could have noticed” redirect responsibility toward different loci—credentialing, training, workload design, and the individual clinician—and argue that expert assessors are systematically prone to misclassify the first three modes as the fourth. The framework therefore yields both a mechanistically explicit analysis of perceptual responsibility and a testable structural source of hindsight bias distinct from its familiar memorial form.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cognitive Permeation, Perceptual Learning, and Theory-Ladenness of Observation#688577
- Sensory Character and Participatory Disclosure: Beyond Representation and Naive Realism#708676
- After-effects and the reach of perceptual content#769269
- From Trait Vectors to Circuits: Tracing Refusal and Sycophancy Through Language Models#1036907
- Refusal-Driven Dimensionality Reduction Theory (RDRT): A Thermodynamic Framework for Consciousness Grounded in Recursive Limits#716010
Record · ID 692545
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive