PhilArchive
open access
Towards a Biosemiotic Theoretical Biology: Sign Processes and Meaning-Making in Living Systems
First Paragraph: Reproduction is widely regarded as a key concept in biology and considered fundamental to life as we know it. However, it is often framed narrowly in terms of heredity (primarily genetic transmission) and epistemically confined to measuring differential fitness. This reductive perspective fails to account for the material and relational causal processes involved in organismal continuity and renewal. In a broad sense, reproduction is the process through which living entities produce new individuals of their kind. However, the phenomenon of biological renewal is expressed through various terms rooted in different theoretical traditions. These include generation, reproduction, replication, regeneration, and reconstitution, each offering different, though often overlapping, views of the process. The term “reproduction” emerged in biology in the mid-eighteenth century, replacing “generation” and shifting the view of life from isolated creation of entities to lineage-based continuity (Etxeberria, 2023; Jacob, 1970). Whereas reproduction encompasses organismallevel processes of generating offspring, later on, with the development of molecular biology, it was often overtaken by “replication,” which focuses on the copying of genetic material (Wilkins and Bourrat, 2022). In contrast, recent philosophy of biology argues, from a developmental point of view, that reproduction includes the entire process throughout an organism’s life cycle, not just gamete or zygote formation (Griesemer, 2016). This broader perspective extends to concepts like “regeneration,” which used to refer to the restoration of lost or damaged organs and limbs, but now includes ecosystem recovery (Maienschein and MacCord, 2022). Lastly, “reconstitution” refers to phenomena of system recreation beyond lineage or genealogical continuity in holobionts and microbial symbioses; it emphasizes the dynamic interplay of relationships and processes that restore phenotypic variants through time (Veigl et al., 2022).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Toward Expanded Reproduction: An Intraorganismal and Interorganismal Relational Account#690806
- The evolution of the biological sciences#77297
- Reproduction and Responsibility: A Philosophical Appeal for Reform#77916
- Endosimbiosis versus selección natural: un falso dilema en la educación#716247
- The "history" of biodiversity. A Bergsonian look at the theory of evolution#772123
Record · ID 693085
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive