PhilArchive
open access
Heidegger AI Textual Research Investigations: A History of Philosophy from Thomas Aquinas to Kant (GA 23)
Heidegger AI Textual Research Investigations: A History of Philosophy from Thomas Aquinas to Kant (GA 23). By Daniel Fidel Ferrer. Copyright©2026 Daniel Fidel Ferrer. All rights reserved. Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND. Imprint 1.0. 2026. WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) digital. All Rights are Reserved. Intended copies of this work can be used for research and teaching. No change in the content, and must include my full name, Daniel Fidel Ferrer. Enjoying reading and disagreeing. Publisher: Kuhn von Verden Verlag. Language: English and German. Includes bibliographical references and an index. Pages 1-294. Socratic questioning. Who am I, the author of these investigations? That is an important question. I, Daniel Fidel Ferrer, am the human copyright owner (©Daniel Fidel Ferrer, 2026) of this work. Technically, I am the one guiding the process as the “prompt engineer.” Daniel Fidel Ferrer as the “Prompt Artist”. AI conducted by ©Daniel Fidel Ferrer, 2026. Maestro. I can consider myself the Maestro suggeritore. Table of Contents. Summaries. 10 Major Heideggerian Themes Emerging from the Lecture. Forgotten Question of Being and the History of Metaphysics. Spinoza and Leibniz: Being as Substance, Necessity, Ground, and the Deepening of the Forgetting of Being. 20 Unresolved Questions in Heidegger’s GA 23. Final Heideggerian Interpretation of Aquinas in GA 23. Spinoza and the Transformation of Metaphysics from Substance to Absolute Ground. Heidegger’s ordering is philosophically deliberate: Descartes → Spinoza → Leibniz → Wolff → Kant. What Is Missing in Heidegger’s Analysis of Spinoza in GA 23? Critical Analysis of Heidegger’s Interpretation of Wolff (1926/27). German Idealism’s Inheritance of Wolffian Concerns: The Problem of System. One of the most important but often underestimated connections in the history of German philosophy is the continuity between Christian Wolff’s systematic rationalism and German Idealism. Although Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel transform or criticize Wolffian metaphysics, they inherit one of its deepest assumptions: philosophy must be a system. From Christian Wolff’s Rational Ontology to Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel — and Heidegger’s Critique. Can philosophy become a complete science of reason? Auch muss auf Heidegger zurückgegangen werden!
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ferrer AI Created Syllabus Classics of Western Philosophy Course 2026#691556
- Heidegger AI Textual Investigations: Saying of Anaximander GA 78#693728
- Heidegger AI Textual Research Investigations: Zürcher Seminar (1951) (GA 9)#176182
- Heidegger AI Textual Research Investigations: Being and Time Finishing the Third Division#204219
- Kant AI Textual Investigations: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals#690729
Record · ID 693512
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive