PhilArchive
open access
The Architecture of Intentional Activation
This paper develops a functional theory of authored agency: the conditions under which a cognitive or physical process counts as owned, executively controlled, and deliberately activated. Rather than treating consciousness as passive awareness or as a synonym for phenomenal experience, the framework proposes a narrower operational criterion: a process belongs to authored agency if and only if the executive mind deliberately activates it. On this view, awareness is necessary but not sufficient for authorship. The paper applies this principle to the daydreaming driver, flow-state performance, and the moral outburst, arguing that a single architecture can distinguish unowned automaticity from delegated automaticity without collapsing the difference between skilled habit and deliberate control. It then extends the theory temporally through the distinction between occurrent and parametric directives, explaining how readiness, erosion, and write-back allow authored episodes to revise future automatic responses. This working-paper version stops at the core architecture plus a brief locating note. Proposed behavioral tests and a downstream legal taxonomy are left for later work; they are not required to state or use the Principle.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Focō, Ergo Volō, "I Focus, therefore I Will" : A Unified Model of Attention#707315
- From Aristotelian Act-Potency to Artificial Algorithms: Neuroethics of AI-mediated Neurotechnology as Extrinsic Actualizing Principle and Integrity of Human Agency#707096
- Imagination, Endogenous Attention, and Mental Agency#100913
- Forced Yet Free: What Magicians' Forcing Reveals Beyond Intentional Binding#1063627
- Human–AI Co-Thinking Dynamics (HACD): Long-Term Effects of AI as a Thinking Space on Humans (Model v1.0, Status 2025)#103427
Record · ID 693976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive