Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

The Primordial Consciousness Field: Reflexivity, Localization, and the Actualization of Potentialities

Marassi, L.
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper introduces the Primordial Consciousness Field (PCF) as a formally structured ontological hypothesis: the proposal that consciousness is not an emergent property of physical organization but a primordial, field-like substrate whose local modulations constitute individual subjects. Drawing on structural analogies with Quantum Field Theory (QFT), phenomenological philosophy, and the metaphysical framework of the Conscious One (Almeida, 2026), the proposal positions itself as a second-order metaphysical hypothesis rather than an empirical theory. We argue that the persistent resistance of subjectivity to physicalist reduction, together with the unity and intelligibility of conscious experience, is more coherently accommodated within a reflexive phenomenal field ontology than within strictly materialist alternatives. This formal framework is strengthened by a heuristic self-observation operator Ω̂, whose structure draws on rigorous results from companion papers in nonextensive statistical mechanics (Marassi, 2026a, 2026b). Those works demonstrate that self-referential nonlinear operators naturally generate fixed points, Lyapunov functionals, gradient-flow dynamics, and an H-theorem—properties employed here as architectural analogies to enhance the internal coherence of the PCF model. The defense of Hypothesis H-C (Actualization of Potentialities)—according to which the universe is the process whereby an implicitly complete consciousness field progressively makes its experiential possibilities explicit—is correspondingly sharpened: its core formal condition, supp(Ψ(τ)) ⊆ supp(Ψ(0)), is not only philosophically motivated but structurally supported in the statistical-mechanical analogue. The model’s evaluative criteria are internal coherence, explanatory reach across phenomena that materialism cannot accommodate, and productive dialogue with empirical science and the philosophical tradition.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 694312
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive