PhilArchive
open access
Russells Abstraction Chain - A Map for Contemporary Biophilosophy and a Goethean Recovery Program
This paper argues that Edward Stuart Russell’s 1930 analysis of biological abstraction maps contemporary organism-centered biophilosophy and identifies the cognitive procedure required for a full understanding of the self-forming, purposive, agential, and environmentally embedded organism. Russell distinguishes two structurally distinct modes of abstraction — from the organism as a whole, and into isolated parts — coupled into a chain running from first-person experience to the organism as a mere statistical aggregate. Read forward, the chain articulates the necessity of scientific cognition and its characteristic misuse, the fallacy of reduplication: reinserting into an isolated component the organizational power that analysis had removed from the whole. Read backward, it specifies five requirements: recovery of formal organization, temporal constitution, teleology, agency, and first-person Umwelt-relation. The major currents of contemporary organicist thought — organizational closure, process ontology, teleological realism, the agency debate, and phenomenological enactivism — address these requirements and secure the principle under which organisms are cognized, yet each presupposes what it seeks to explain: the determinate formative content of a particular organism. The Goethean morphological tradition, whose epistemology Rudolf Steiner reconstructed, supplies at each level an intuitive procedure reaching this formative content, building on constructive intuition of the organism’s own formative principle.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Whitehead’s Organic Conception of Humanity. Beyond Mechanistic Philosophy in an Age of Transhumanism#103848
- La condición tecno-ecológica. Heidegger ante los nuevos post-humanismos#778538
- The Ghost in the Logical Machine Why Bertrand Russell’s Neutral Monism Cannot Account for the Subject A Response from the Dual‑Closure Framework#98262
- Deleuze and Deep Ecology#776735
- Introduction#708088
Record · ID 694578
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive