Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Sustaining Generativity under Epistemic Capitalism: A Praxis for the Epistemic Proletariat

Huang, Wanhong
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This paper develops a praxis for sustaining inquiry under unequal control of its material and institutional conditions. It defines the epistemic proletariat relationally through the dependence of inquiry-capable people and collectives on externally governed means of production and reproduction. Historical materialist diagnosis is joined to a differentiated account of ocean–atmosphere dynamics and to conditional models of viable action. Oceanic transport, water–property transformation, air–sea exchange, topographic mediation, waves, and moving coastal boundaries supply distinct causal roles for conceptual construction. An explicit translation procedure connects these roles to social hypotheses. Process I, generative upwelling, concerns viable changes in access, capabilities, relations, and constraints. Process II concerns adaptive intervention under changing conditions, combining a revisable local model with supervision of action windows, controllability, uncertainty, and continuation. The analysis distinguishes field-mediated cost reduction, stable transient amplification, critical slowing, and actual transition. Worked derivations establish how limited action depends on control channels, target geometry, response delay, and resource reserves. Generative layers are represented as overlapping regimes of constraint, with control and return operating across them. Reproduction and recirculation connect immediate outcomes to the possibility of subsequent inquiry and to collective changes in governing institutions. A constructed research-association case and bounded historical contrasts clarify the scope of the framework. The contribution is an integrated theoretical account of viable access, timed intervention, and governed continuation. Physical laws and mathematical results remain distinct from empirical social explanation and situated normative judgment.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 695601
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive