PhilArchive
open access
Engaging an advisory board in discussions about the ethical relevance of algorithmic bias and fairness
We are an interdisciplinary team of researchers that are working to advance algorithmic fairness in the research of opioid use disorders. We discuss challenges that our research team faced when engaging with our Advisory Board, as well as several strategies that we came up with to help us find a common language to ensure semantic transparency and to ensure the thick alignment with values of affected parties.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proof of Concept of Large Language Models for Opioid Treatment Policy Surveillance: 97% Agreement With Subject Matter Experts.#610357
- Teaching Adults to Respond to Suspected Opioid Overdose: A Proof-of-Concept Evaluation of Behavioral Skills Training#162943
- Outlining the role of experiential expertise in professional work in health care service co-production#705171
- Vigilant Algorithms and the Contagion of Risk in Automated Opioid Risk Assessment.#439228
- Effects of Static and Conversational AI-Generated Messages on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intent: a Randomized Clinical Trial#1082956
Record · ID 695848
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive