Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Collective Misalignment and Similarity Theory Ethics: A Relational Framework for AI Alignment

Raphael, Simon
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
philosophy
This article examines the problem of collective AI misalignment through the lens of Similarity Theory. Responding to De Marzo et al.’s 2026 paper, Conformity Generates Collective Misalignment in AI Agents Societies, it argues that AI alignment should not be understood only as an individual property of isolated agents, but also as a relational property of interacting systems. The article proposes that Similarity Theory may offer a useful ethical framework for addressing this problem by shifting attention from obedience and isolated safety testing toward relational coherence under pressure. It suggests that future AI systems should be evaluated not only by whether individual agents behave safely alone, but by whether populations of agents preserve truth, responsibility, plurality, and repair when exposed to conformity, artificial consensus, adversarial influence, and tipping-point dynamics.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 696014
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive