PhilArchive
open access
Climate justice discussions need new participants and new audiences
This Correspondence argues in response to Coolsaet et al. (2024) that there is an important role to play for stance-independent justice discussions that are not tied to specific social, political or critical perspectives. These can be valuable for climate research audiences, but also as a basis upon which to critically debate and research injustices.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Advancing the interdisciplinary dialogue on climate justice#87571
- The Ethics of Climate Nudges: Central Issues for Applying Choice Architecture Interventions to Climate Policy#767864
- How Uncertainty Interacts with Ethical Values in Climate Change Research#71122
- A new decade of research on the economics of climate change. Editorial#17119
- Shall We Adapt? Evolutionary Ethics and Climate Change#740567
Record · ID 696791
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive