PhilArchive
open access
The Truth in Hybrid Semantics
Hybrid metaethical theories come in many forms, but a particularly natural class of such theories takes their inspiration from terms in natural language which seem to have some conventional semantic meaning over and above their truth-conditions. Theories based on this comparison are naturally paired with naturalist metaethical views in order to make sense of how there is more to moral language and thought than naturalistic thought or talk. This chapter takes up the question of how to think about truth in such a hybrid metaethical theory. A simple model is given for how to distinguish between two different ways a word may contribute something extra to a sentence over and above its truth conditions. The consequences of this distinction for hybrid expressivism are explored.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Attitudinal Expressivism and Logical Pragmatism#710876
- Hybrid Theories: Cognitive Expressivism#91709
- Noncognitivism without expressivism#87785
- Global Expressivism: language agency without semantics, reality without metaphysics#101771
- Inferentialism as an Alternative to Expressivism#112397
Record · ID 697220
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive