PhilArchive
open access
Modal Realism, Counterpart Theory, and Unactualized Possibilities
It is a commonsense thesis that unactualized possibilities are not parts of actuality. To keep his modal realism in line with this thesis, David Lewis employed his indexical account of the term “actual.” I argue that the addition of counterpart theory to Lewis’s modal realism undermines his strategy for respecting the commonsense thesis. The case made here also reveals a problem for Lewis’s attempt to avoid haecceitism.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lewis' Modal Realism and Absence Causation#697841
- On the Plurality of Parts of Classes#85063
- Spread Worlds, Plenitude and Modal Realism: A Problem for David Lewis#760815
- Overall similarity, natural properties, and paraphrases#738248
- Truth as Energetic Admissibility_ Invariants, Substrate, and the Elimination of Conflated “Truth” Concepts#108665
Record · ID 697847
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive