PhilArchive
open access
A comprehensive Covid-19 response—the need for economic evaluation
Although policymakers and investigators still struggle to quantify and compare the effects of various Covid-related interventions, we are steadily amassing data that could help inform choices. The pandemic’s medical, social, and economic harms have been immense, and they warrant a continuous policy response. All decision makers use some type of mental model to weigh the pros and cons of various policy options. Rigorous economic evaluation formalizes this process. Value judgments will still be required, but economic evaluation can make the decision-making process more systematic, comprehensive, and transparent.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Viruses Without Borders and the Medical Research Agenda#96746
- A Systems Approach to Predict the Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 in the Population of a City; COVID-19#918062
- Difficult Trade-Offs in Response to COVID-19: The Case for Open and Inclusive Decision-Making#757293
- Values for a Post-Pandemic Future#732958
- Pre-pandemic blood profiles predict COVID-19 hospitalization and death a decade later#318542
Record · ID 699163
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive