PhilArchive
open access
Misinformation, Freedom of Expression and Mandatory Vaccination
In their recent book, Inducing Immunity (2024), Roland Pierik and Marcel Verweij develop an account of collective immunization according to which liberal-democratic governments are sometimes justified in restricting people's freedom to refuse vaccination. In this commentary, I focus on a specific argument in the book about misinformation, freedom of expression and mandatory vaccination. Pierik and Verweij argue that, when vaccine misinformation threatens vaccination rates, governments—in order to increase or maintain vaccination rates—should consider mandatory vaccination before restricting freedom of expression. I summarize the argument and raise two issues to help advance the debate.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- First Amendment Challenges to Regulation of Social Media#621943
- Paternalistic Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Healthcare#699154
- Toleration, Respect for Persons, and the Free Speech Right to do Moral Wrong#89552
- Adding Insult to Injury#108845
- COVID-19, Fake News, and Vaccines: Should Regulation Be Implemented?#23839
Record · ID 699170
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive