PhilArchive
open access
Blameworthy Required Acts and Deontic Status Tracing
In certain cases – Alone/Together Dilemmas, Single-Agent Dilemmas, and Actualist “Professor Procrastinate” Cases – an agent is required to perform incompatible actions, such that performing some act required of her is a way of failing to perform another act which is also required of her. The act she performs is thereby wrong – even as it is required. According to my theory, Deontic Status Tracing, whether an agent is blameworthy for such an act depends on what explains its bizarre deontic status – namely, whether it is her fault that this act is simultaneously required and wrong.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is blameworthiness terminable?#728376
- AN EXTENDED ATMS FOR DECOMPOSABLE PROBLEMS#933456
- Beyond Imitation: Auditing the Recoverability of Reasoning in Distilled Models#1062116
- A noção de causalidade final na filosofia da natureza de Aristoteles#734398
- Stability in stochastic hypergraph matching III: general reneging#1109530
Record · ID 699180
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive