PhilArchive
open access
A Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Computational Reasoning Evaluation in Large Language Models: Beyond Benchmarks
The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) capable of mathematical, logical, algorithmic, and statistical reasoning has exposed a critical gap in evaluation methodologies: existing benchmarks are siloed by domain, use incompatible scoring rubrics, and fail to capture the quality of reasoning processes. We argue that the pursuit of a single “best” model is undermined by the lack of a shared conceptual space for comparing reasoning across heterogeneous tasks. In this paper, we propose the Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Reasoning (UFR-CR), a theory-driven, benchmark-agnostic evaluation architecture that transcends traditional category boundaries. Instead of introducing a new dataset, UFR-CR introduces four universal reasoning dimensions — Chain Depth, Knowledge Type, Creativity Demand, and Computational Load—that enable any existing task to be mapped into a common feature space. Coupled with a three-tier elicitation protocol (standardised prompting, controlled trace extraction, and human-in-the-loop validation) and a robust statistical resampling procedure, the framework provides a fair, reproducible, and interpretable mechanism for comparing LLMs across distinct reasoning domains. We outline a concrete instantiation of the framework using four established benchmarks (MATH, LogiQA, HumanEval, and DROP) and specify an experimental protocol, together with a set of pre-registered, falsifiable hypotheses about expected outcomes and their sensitivity to methodological choices. No experiments have yet been run under this protocol; the hypotheses are offered as a concrete target for empirical validation rather than as findings. We discuss the implications for model development, the limitations of current trace evaluation, and a roadmap for community adoption. This work shifts the focus from creating yet another leaderboard to establishing a principled, unified language for reasoning assessment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092500
- Trace Grafting: Cross-Model Reasoning in Large Language Model Code Generation#1092484
- Open-Source vs. Commercial Coding Assistants: A 2025 Comparison of DeepSeek R1, Qwen 2.5 and Claude 3.7#73346
- Harness Engineering in LLM Tool Use via Agent-Native Reusable Tool Primitives#822166
- Code Is Not the Answer: On Systemic Output-Modality Bias in Large Language Models#690046
Record · ID 699249
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive