PhilArchive
open access
Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 22)
In this paper, we examine the selection of a romantic partner. In choosing a romantic partner, the subject necessarily has certain selection criteria, and these criteria are inevitably reflections of the subject's psychological needs. We once again employ the method of Super-Existence in analyzing this process of choice. We know that the selection of a romantic partner is not merely a man's choice of a woman but also a woman's choice of a man. In essence, romantic partner selection is a two-way process. However, in this paper we consider only one party's selection of the other and do not discuss mutual selection. The issue of two-way selection will be examined in the next section.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 9)#165038
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 13)#708864
- Social Choice Phenomenology — A Critique of Sartre (Part 4)#100272
- The Ape That Understood the Universe: How the Mind and Culture Evolve by Steve Stewart-Williams#737114
- Husserl’s theory of instincts as a theory of affection#702653
Record · ID 699391
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive