PhilArchive
open access
Defending Awareness and the Substructure of Knowledge: Replies to Aronowitz, Littlejohn, and Neta
It is difficult to convey my gratitude for the time and effort that Sara, Clayton and Ram spent on developing probing and insightful questions about Awareness and the Substructure of Knowledge. I, strangely, know more now about my own project than I did when I wrote it. Despite our disagreements about how some of the questions below are to be answered, I was exceedingly pleased to learn of their varying degrees of openness to and, in some cases, agreement with the central idea that there are factive states that fall short of knowledge. Perhaps these replies will increase our degree of agreement.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Primacy of Knowledge: A Critical Survey of Timothy Williamson's Views on Knowledge, Assertion and Scepticism#740465
- The Burden of Knowledge#183595
- Ignorance and awareness#107449
- Debating Self-Knowledge, by Anthony Brueckner and Gary Ebbs#696912
- Review of _Justification as Ignorance_ by Sven Rosenkranz#769123
Record · ID 699447
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive