PhilArchive
open access
Kuhn Still Matters
Despite his enormous influence on the philosophy of science, Kuhn seems to have been unfairly treated by philosophers. His work was often oversimplified, misinterpreted, and quickly dismissed. The legacy of Kuhn for contemporary philosophy of science seems to be unfortunately thin. This book revisits his legacy for the history and philosophy of science and reflects on the prospect of the Kuhnian philosophy of science. It explores Kuhnian or neo-Kuhnian approaches to central issues in twenty-first philosophy of science. It also rereads Kuhn's published and unpublished work and reassesses its philosophical significance and historical context.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Critical Assessment of Thomas Kuhn's Understanding of Scientific Progress#119164
- Kuhn’s “wrong turning” and legacy today#723742
- The heuristic circularity of commitment and the experience of discovery: A Polanyian critique of Thomas Kuhn's _Structure of Scientific Revolutions_#753945
- Kuhn, Pedagogy, and Practice: A Local Reading of Structure#759249
- "If I join forces with Mr. Kuhn": Polanyi and Kuhn as Mutually Supportive and Corrective#753866
Record · ID 699500
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive