Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

A Good Deal? Thoughts on Zangwill’s argument for carnivorism

Bali, Paul
PhilArchive · Papers
Open Source ↗
Mark Zangwill [2021, 2022] argues that we have a moral duty to eat meat where we've been in a mutually beneficial relation with the kind of animal eaten. While there may be, in principle, an ethically defensible mutualism between humans and the animals we feed on, I argue that our actual relation with even animals outside the factory farm seems exploitive, not mutualist. Castration (usually sans analgesic), maternal deprivation, and genetic contortion (if only the slow contortion of selective breeding) impose severe harms on animals. Moreover, any "deal" the farmed animals enter into is signed under duress: is signed during the Anthropocene, when animals of no use to us are being eliminated from Earth.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 699534
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive