PhilArchive
open access
The Virtue Approach to Argument
Virtues (and vices) are persistent dispositions of character. Virtue theories of argument posit that such dispositions are at least necessary (and perhaps sufficient) for a complete account of argumentation. This chapter provides an overview of the most prominent versions of this approach and of the objections of its leading critics; identifies the parties to whom such virtues should be ascribed; and briefly discusses what we may call the cardinal virtues of argumentation: willingness to engage in argumentation, willingness to listen to others, willingness to modify one's own position, and willingness to question the obvious.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Virtue in argument#114093
- The Methodological Usefulness of Deep Disagreement#759283
- Complex Harmony: Rethinking the Virtue-Continence Distinction#730331
- Dialecticality and Deep Disagreement#115577
- Pascal’s wager: tracking an intended reader in the structure of the argument#771759
Record · ID 699697
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive