PhilArchive
open access
The Preeminent Question of Environmental Philosophy: Where Should We Set the Envirostat?
This chapter argues that there are good moral reasons to think of geoengineering as technology to address both anthropogenic and natural threats to the environment. As geoengineering technology develops, we will increasingly have the ability to adjust the parameters of the environment, e.g., adjust the planet’s temperature, CO2 concentration, etc. With this greater ability comes greater responsibility: we must decide what the Earth’s environment ought to be like in a manner that justly serves its inhabitants—including animals. Thus, the preeminent question of environmental philosophy is: What should the environment be like?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Bibliographical Essay On Environmental Ethics'#712567
- Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Anthropocene#761568
- Questioning Technology's Role in Environmental Ethics: Weak Anthropocentrism Revisited#727636
- Greifswald’s environmental ethics: From the work of the Michael Otto professorship at Ernst Moritz Arndt University 1997–2002#101709
- Environmental Law for Sustainability : A Reader#494187
Record · ID 699986
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive