Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

No Epistemic Respect for Bullshit Machines or LLMs

Mizrahi, Moti · 2025
PhilArchive · Papers · 2025
Open Source ↗
philosophy
The excitement about Large Language Models (LLMs) has led some to consider the possibility that they could be artificial epistemic authorities. For instance, after considering arguments for and against granting LLMs the status of epistemic authorities, Hauswald (2025) argues that the standard view of epistemic authorities should be revised to accommodate LLMs as epistemic authorities. This paper aims to contribute to the literature on LLM or chatbot epistemology by sketching two arguments against granting LLMs the status of epistemic authorities. According to the first argument, if LLMs are bullshit machines, then they should not be granted the status of epistemic authorities that are worthy of our epistemic respect. According to the second argument, if LLMs cannot take responsibility and be held accountable for their outputs, then they should not be granted the status of epistemic authorities that are worthy of our epistemic respect.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 700064
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive