PhilArchive
open access
The Logical Contingency of Identity
I show that intuitive and logical considerations do not justify introducing Leibniz’s Law of the Indiscernibility of Identicals in more than a limited form, as applying to atomic formulas. Once this is accepted, it follows that Leibniz’s Law generalises to all formulas of the first-order Predicate Calculus but not to modal formulas. Among other things, identity turns out to be logically contingent.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Contingency of the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles in Leibniz#86454
- Indistinguishability beyond diff-equivalence in ProVerif#247983
- Leibniz Did Not State Leibniz's Law#110980
- The New Leibniz's Law Arguments for Pluralism#734843
- Elementary Canonical Formulae: A Survey on Syntactic, Algorithmic, and Modeltheoretic Aspects#711755
Record · ID 700617
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive