PhilArchive
open access
Realismo e antirealismo nella relazione di arte e esperienza religiosa
My starting assumption concerns the default view in western aestethics. My claim is that the view can be characterized in the following manner: while the arts and religious experience are formally different kinds of human experience, the arts have the same content of religious experience (Essentialist claim, EC). I argue that both from a realist and antirealist standpoint EC does not make sense. Consequently, EC should be rejected as the right approach to the relation between the arts and religious experience.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- L’action du virtuel : une échappée historique entre réalité et possibilité#378030
- A RENÚNCIA DE DEUS COMO EXPERIÊNCIA MÍSTICO-ESPECULATIVA: o apofaticismo do Pseudo-Dionísio e o anúncio histórico da morte divina.#103922
- Pensées Magiques: Retour sur le 'Retour du Religieux'#753130
- Încercări de redefinire morală#735315
- Pessoas virtuosas podem fazer coisas más? Aristóteles entre a idealização e o realismo#740204
Record · ID 700884
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive