PhilArchive
open access
The _Paraphilia_ Natural Kind Hypothesis Is Alive and Well: A Response to Lawrence (2026)
Lawrence (2026) is unpersuaded by Bailey and Hsu’s (2025) article, “Psychometric Evidence That Paraphilia Is a Natural Kind,” believing that the study shows the opposite. She thinks its conclusions are “erroneous” and “inexplicable.” However, Lawrence’s critique depends on a fundamental mistake about the notion of a natural kind. Responding to her critique provides an opportunity to try again, in view of what she and likely others do not understand.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Putnam’s Last Papers: Hilary Putnam: Naturalism, Realism, and Normativity, edited by Mario De Caro. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016, 248 pp, $51.50 HB#762150
- R, S, T (Perplexing Presentations: Findings and Welfare), Re [2026] EWFC 194 (B) (23 April 2026)#381628
- R, S, T (Perplexing Presentations: Findings and Welfare), Re [2026] EWFC 194 (B) (23 April 2026)#381624
- The Development of the Paraphilic Disorders Short Screen (PDSS) and Its Examination in Diverse Populations: A Large, Multi-Nation Study.#645403
- 42 U.S.C. § 289d — Animals in research#595139
Record · ID 701208
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive