PhilArchive
open access
Recalibrating the Social Contract: The Global Case for Universal Basic Income in the Age of AI
This paper proposes Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a critical policy response to the economic and social disruptions engendered by artificial intelligence (AI). As automation displaces, or fundamentally transforms, traditional forms of work, AI-driven productivity continues to soar, generating immense value from publicly funded data and infrastructure. By examining historical precedents (including the New Deal and various social welfare models), international case studies (like Finland’s UBI experiment and India’s pilot programs), and emerging ethical and economic rationales, this paper argues that UBI is both a viable evolution of governmental support for citizens and a forward-looking strategy to address global inequality. It further explores how UBI anticipates cultural shifts in a world where work and identity are increasingly decoupled. Bringing together insights from philosophy, economics, and computer science, the paper situates UBI within the broader philosophical discourse on AI’s responsibilities and implications for human dignity and social justice. This discussion forms the first pillar of a trilogy on recalibrating the social contract, to be complemented by free healthcare and lifelong education. Collectively, these pillars propose a blueprint for distributing AI’s vast benefits in ways that uphold human agency, reduce inequality, and preserve social cohesion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Recalibrating the Social Contract: A Blueprint for AI-Resilient Societies#88330
- Can AI Achieve Common Good and Well-being? Implementing the NSTC's R&D Guidelines with a Human-Centered Ethical Approach#93486
- Can AI Tools Enhance Access to Remedies as envisaged under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Yay or Nay? A Critical Assessment#442431
- Great Philosophical Objections to Artificial Intelligence: The History and Legacy of the AI Wars, by Eric Dietrich, Chris Fields, John P. Sullins, Bram van Heuveln, and Robin Zebrowski#118212
- Artificial Intelligence and Law A Neoplatonic Ethical Constitution#691438
Record · ID 701368
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive