PhilArchive
open access
Reanalyzing Chisholm Paradox. Structural Insights
In this paper I focus on the conditions that have to be met for Chisholm’s Paradox (CP) to occur. My claim is that identity and structure are notions closely related to each other. I propose a discussion in which the minimal framework for CP is set, then analyze the paradox in terms of S5, and suggest that in order to capture the core of the paradox one should use a dynamic valuation function for the model. Identity appears, at this point, to be dependent upon a structuralist point of view.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Applying the immobility theory to thoroughly solve the three Zeno’s paradoxes#744553
- Counterfactual Triviality: A Lewis-Impossibility Argument for Counterfactuals#777179
- An Interpretation of McCall’s “Real Possible Worlds” and His Semantics for Counterfactuals#775741
- Determinacy as a Two-Place Relation: The Category Mistake in Quantum Interpretation, and the Dissolution of the Paradox Set#713649
- The Two Envelope 'Paradox'#742131
Record · ID 701475
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive