PhilArchive
open access
On the Nature of Legal Normativity, 37 Revus 83-91 (2019)
In this response to eight commentaries on my article “Kelsen, Hart, and legal normativity” I clarify some points in my original analysis and agree with some comments regarding work that still needs to be done. In particular, I attempt to distinguish my position from both Berkeleyan idealism and mere subjective perception. I agree with the commentators who urge that more must be done to analyze the nature of normativity in general, and legal normativity in particular.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- La cruzada contra el materialismo: el propósito antiateo de George Berkeley#726727
- American Jurisprudence#269769
- Berkeley, Hobbes, and the Constitution of the Self#716925
- On the Transcendental Freedom of the Intellect#752376
- Book Review: Legal Thought and Philosophy: What Legal Scholarship Is About, by Bert van Roermund#734548
Record · ID 701742
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive