PhilArchive
open access
De-Briefing Aime Project : a participant perspective
This paper attempts to evaluate the AIME project immanently, from the perspective of a participant, in terms of five criteria: digitality, diplomacy, religiosity, testability, and democracy. A sixth criterion runs through the other five: pluralism. I distinguish between AIME as project, as process, and as party line.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Designing Games for GDPR: Negotiating Understandings of GDPR in EU Schools.#1177457
- Karl Popper in Africa: Liberal-Communitarianism as Ideology for Democratic Social Reconstruction#73284
- Environmental Pragmatism#733329
- The Power and Problems of Viewing Civics Discussion as a Cultural Activity.#198194
- Reasons and Beliefs#772315
Record · ID 701820
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive