PhilArchive
open access
Can We Do Without a Metaphysical Theory of Personal Identity in Practice?
In this paper, I defend the idea that we need a metaphysical theory to justify identity-related practical concerns, such as self-concern. I outline D. Parfit’s theory, in which the concerns receive a metaphysical justification. Then, I focus on two objections: C. Korsgaard’s claim that the concerns are justified by the unity of agency, and M. Johnston’s contention that the concerns are prima facie justified independently of a metaphysical theory. I argue that even if these theories have a point, they do not cover a range of situations in which justification may be sought. It is in these situations that a metaphysical theory may find its place.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Metaphysics of the Narrative Self#762692
- The Social Nature of Individual Self-Identity: Akan and Narrative Conceptions of Personhood#698421
- The Self-Referential Paradox and Existence Predicate Problem of the Cogito: An Analytical Critique of Descartes’ “I Think, Therefore I Am”#81465
- Post-Kantian Idealism and Self-Transformation#119165
- Personal Identity, Possible Worlds, and Medical Ethics#729330
Record · ID 701928
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive