PhilArchive
open access
Can It Be that Tully=Cicero?
We show, that given two fundamental theses of Kripke, no statement of the form ‘‘a=b’ is necessarily true’, is true, if ‘a’ and ‘b’ are distinct rigid designators.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Kripke's Second Paragraph of Philosophical Investigations 201#776682
- did cbor representation#128443
- Comments on Saul Kripke’s A Puzzle about Time and Thought#111257
- The Hermeneutics of Tyranny: The “Oust Duterte Call” From the View of Anselm and Aquinas#729821
- Kants kategorischer Imperativ und die Kriterien gebotener, verbotener und freigestellter Handlungen#725469
Record · ID 702049
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive