PhilArchive
open access
Foreknowledge and Free Will
We contend that since what is true cannot be false, foreknowledge is transparently incompatible with free will. We argue that what is crucial to the conflict is the role of truth in foreknowledge and that the identity of the one who foreknows is irrelevant.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Value of Truth#733294
- Infallible Divine Foreknowledge cannot Uniquely Threaten Human Freedom, but its Mechanics Might#704032
- Reasons Against Belief: A Theory of Epistemic Defeat#749360
- The Truth about Foreknowledge#92265
- Aap zoekt zin. Waarom wij bewustzijn, vrije wil, cultuur en religie hebben. ISVW, 2014 (Ape / Monkey Seeks Meaning: Why We Have Consciousness, Free Will, Culture, and Religion”)2014):#768730
Record · ID 702075
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive