PhilArchive
open access
Following the Science: Pandemic Policy Making and Reasonable Worst-Case Scenarios
The UK has been ‘following the science’ in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in line with the national framework for the use of scientific advice in assessment of risk. We argue that the way in which it does so is unsatisfactory in two important respects. Firstly, pandemic policy making is not based on a comprehensive assessment of policy impacts. And secondly, the focus on reasonable worst-case scenarios as a way of managing uncertainty results in a loss of decision-relevant information and does not provide a coherent basis for policy making.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Anatomy of a Conspiracy Theory: Law, Politics, and Science Denialism in the Era of COVID-19#1021957
- Escaping the metric-driven governance trap in global health: how DALYs and coverage indicators mislead policymakers in LMICs.#265636
- Pandemic#43306
- Logic of catastrophe - deep logic of reality#697350
- A Systems Approach to Predict the Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 in the Population of a City; COVID-19#918062
Record · ID 702792
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive