PhilArchive
open access
Postscript: Reply to McLeod
This is my reply to McLeod’s reply (2015a) to my (2015) paper commenting on his (2011) interpretation of Wang Chong 王充 as an alethic pluralist.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confucian Mothering: The Origin of Tiger Mothering?#739726
- The Chinese Nightingale, and Other Poems#448
- Turandot: The Chinese Sphinx#43434
- “孔子谓老子犹龙”叙事非孔子本语——基于春秋文本意象、修辞范式与观念史的多维辨伪|The Narrative “Confucius Spoke of Laozi as a Dragon” Is Not Confucius’ Original Words: A Multi-Dimensional Authenticity Critique Based on Spring and Autumn Textual Imagery, Rhetorical Paradigms and Intellectual History#694599
- Instigations Together with An Essay on the Chinese Written Character#50293
Record · ID 703435
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive