PhilArchive
open access
Understanding Implicit Bias: Putting the Criticism into Perspective
What is the status of research on implicit bias? In light of meta‐analyses revealing ostensibly low average correlations between implicit measures and behavior, as well as various other psychometric concerns, criticism has become ubiquitous. We argue that while there are significant challenges and ample room for improvement, research on the causes, psychological properties, and behavioral effects of implicit bias continues to deserve a role in the sciences of the mind as well as in efforts to understand, and ultimately combat, discrimination and inequality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Review: Implicit Bias and Philosophy (vol. 1 & 2)#116175
- Assessing the implicit bias research program: Comments on Brownstein, Gawronski, and Madva versus Machery#724234
- When do circumstances excuse? Moral prejudices and beliefs about the true self drive preferences for agency-minimizing explanations#713152
- Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: 'Theory of mind' and moral judgment#745620
- Extended Implicit Bias: When the Metaphysics and Ethics of Implicit Bias Collide#760244
Record · ID 703535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive