PhilArchive
open access
Naive realism and the scientific narration of perception
Naive realism is a widely debated topic in the philosophy of the mind. In this article I will review the theses of naive realism through the works of one of the most influential philosophers who supported and developed them, Michael Martin. Once the reasons why naive realism should be supported are discussed, I will propose an empirical argument to show that naive realism and the most basic scientific knowledge of perceptive processes are contradictory.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Argument Against Papineau’s Qualitative View of Sensory Experience#119581
- The Arationality of Perception: Comments on Susanna Siegel#759359
- "The Nature of Perception" by John Foster and "Perception and Reason" by Bill Brewer#712662
- Perceptual Experience and the Capacity to Act#766337
- Perception and Objective Being: Peter Auriol on Perceptual Acts and their Objects#748525
Record · ID 703735
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive