PhilArchive
open access
A fourth solution to a Victorian anthropology paradox: underdeterminism
Historian of anthropology George Stocking tells us: from the point of view of parts of the Victorian middle class, Victorian society was highly evolved yet also contained savage components. Why don’t they change their ways, or why didn’t they? There is a Quinean solution.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Telegraph’s 11/9/25 paradox? What to make of all these similar-looking female Labour politicians?#105236
- Briois F., Darras V. dir. (1999) ‒ La pierre taillée : ressources, technologie, diffusion : Séminaire du Centre d’Anthropologie, Toulouse 1999, Toulouse, Archives d’Ecologie préhistorique (Séminaires du Centre d’Anthropologie), 71 p.#1146914
- Victorian anthropology paradox: another solution#113077
- Darwinism and economics, edited by Geoffrey M. Hodgson (The International Library of Critical Writings in Economics Series, vol. 233). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2009, 457 pp#711515
- A neglected difficulty with Social Darwinism#749341
Record · ID 704292
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive