PhilArchive
open access
How to Revise Beliefs from Conditionals: A New Proposal
A large body of work has demonstrated the utility of the Bayesian framework for capturing inference in both specialist and everyday contexts. However, the central tool of the framework, conditionalization via Bayes’ rule, does not apply directly to a common type of learning: the acquisition of conditional information. How should an agent change her beliefs on learning that “If A, then C”? This issue, which is central to both reasoning and argumentation, has recently prompted considerable research interest. In this paper, we critique a prominent proposal and provide a new, alternative, answer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Logic of Facts; Or, Every-day Reasoning#48473
- Learning to Reason with Insight for Informal Theorem Proving#31254
- Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education#745907
- Tense and Aspect in Learner Writing. Advanced Swedish Learners' use of Tense and Aspect in English Argumentative Text#408567
- Inference, Taking, and Reason-Responsiveness#82961
Record · ID 704422
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive