PhilArchive
open access
Disability without Denial
Both of the following can be true together: (1) Impairments make people worse off, adding to the difficulties of making a life go well; and (2) people who have impairments deserve respect. Not only are these claims consistent, but it is also natural to connect them; it is natural to say that (2) is true because(1) is true. People who need to overcome great obstacles to succeed deserve respect for trying to overcome them, let alone for succeeding. The following are also consistent with (1) and (2), and are, in my view, true:(3) Some impairments leave people less badly off than the able-bodied or minded think; (4) those with impairments are worse off than they would be if social policies were different; and (5) the basis for many if not all impairments is physical.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Disability and Well-Being#737567
- A Critical Analysis of the Disability Paradox: Reconceptualising Well-Being and Human Flourishing#690491
- How to (Consistently) Reject the Options Argument#87159
- Disability and the problem of suffering#763060
- The Picture Theory of Disability#89531
Record · ID 704801
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive