PhilArchive
open access
Productive consensus on measuring awareness requires stronger theory. Commentary on Stockart et al, 2025
Stockart et al. make a well-intentioned attempt to build consensus over the measurement of awareness, a topic of controversy for 40 years. But their recurring slippage between subjective and objective measures overlooks a neural tension between fundamentally distinct modes of understanding. Opposing Domains Theory explains why: disagreements persist, “triple tasks” can backfire, and “cross-validation” needs to be reconceptualized.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Strategic Prompting Scale (SPS) for Measuring Metacognitive Regulation in Human-AI Interaction.#415569
- Scientific Progress, Understanding, and Knowledge: Reply to Park#719280
- The bitter truth about sugar and willpower#774487
- Metacognitive judgments in a complex span task : Evidence for a monitoring-control loop in working memory#156100
- Information Flow, Representation, and Awareness#725299
Record · ID 704825
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive